Get your free consultation today!
Share with your Colleagues
Categories
ROI Calculator
Moonstone Interactive is the only San Francisco Bay Area web design firm and Internet Marketing expert that offers a free online ROI Calculator
Author: Eric Erskine

Table of Contents
- Phase 1: Establish Baselines and Migration Requirements
- Phase 2: Protect Crawlability and Prevent Pre-Launch Indexing
- Phase 3: Build a URL and Redirect Strategy That Preserves Equity
- Phase 4: Re-Architect Information Architecture Around Search Intent
- Phase 5: Make the CMS “SEO-Ready” by Design
- Phase 6: Performance, Core Web Vitals, and Modern Rendering Validation
- Phase 7: Analytics, Search Console, and Post-Launch Monitoring
- Phase 8: Use AI to Improve Editorial Scale Without Sacrificing Quality
A website redesign should improve performance, conversions, and brand credibility - but it can also wipe out years of organic growth in a single release. In 2025, redesign risk is higher than ever because sites are more complex: headless and hybrid CMS architectures, composable stacks, JavaScript rendering, personalization layers, multiple domains, and multi-channel content delivery all introduce SEO failure points that didn’t exist a decade ago.
The good news is that redesign SEO is highly controllable when it’s treated like a disciplined migration program, not a “launch and fix later” moment. This guide walks through a modern, practical checklist you can use to protect rankings, improve indexation, and set the new experience up for measurable growth. It’s written for teams working in enterprise CMS and DXP environments, whether you’re on Kentico, WordPress, Optimizely (Episerver), or a technology-agnostic stack.

Why Redesigns Still Break SEO (And Why It’s Harder in 2026)
Redesigns often fail in search because teams treat SEO as a finishing task rather than as a set of architectural and governance decisions. SEO performance depends on stable signals - URLs, internal linking, content intent, crawlability, and consistent semantics. Redesigns disrupt those signals by changing information architecture, templates, navigation, and routing. If the platform shift includes a headless front-end, SPA behavior, or a new personalization engine, the crawl-and-render model may change as well.
Modern stacks introduce additional pitfalls: content is distributed across systems, multiple teams publish in parallel, and “simple” changes like URL normalization or localization routing can create index bloat, duplication, or rendering gaps. The solution is not more tools - it’s a workflow that ties SEO requirements to build standards, QA gates, and deployment governance.

Phase 1: Establish Baselines and Migration Requirements
Before you redesign anything, you need a clear picture of what currently performs and why. Treat this like due diligence. If the team can’t explain where traffic comes from today, it can’t protect it tomorrow.
Start by capturing a full crawl of the current site, including status codes, canonical tags, indexability signals, internal link structure, headings, structured data, and template patterns. Pair that crawl with Search Console exports for top queries, top landing pages, and index coverage issues. Add analytics data for organic landing pages, conversion paths, and pages that support revenue or lead gen. This dataset becomes your “SEO migration inventory” and the reference for every decision that follows.
You should also document platform behaviors that influence SEO: how the CMS generates URLs, how it handles trailing slashes, whether it enforces lowercase routing, how it outputs canonicals, and how it manages pagination, faceted navigation, and localization. These details vary across systems (including Kentico, WordPress, and Optimizely), and they matter because they shape how search engines discover and interpret content.
Phase 2: Protect Crawlability and Prevent Pre-Launch Indexing
Staging and QA environments must be blocked from indexing - always. In 2025, this includes more than a robots.txt rule. Modern crawlers can still discover and cache content in unexpected ways, especially in publicly accessible environments.
Use multiple layers: authentication where possible, a sitewide noindex directive on non-production, and strict control of canonical tags so staging never points to staging. Ensure that preview URLs, shared links, and assets aren’t exposed through public sitemaps or open directories. If your redesign includes a headless front-end, verify that preview endpoints and API content are not unintentionally exposed to the public web.
This is also the moment to implement governance: define who can create new routes, what URL patterns are allowed, and how content types map to indexable templates. Without governance, redesigns often ship with uncontrolled URL generation - parameters, duplicates, or test routes that inflate crawl demand and weaken index quality.
Phase 3: Build a URL and Redirect Strategy That Preserves Equity
Redirects are not just a technical checklist item - they’re the backbone of equity preservation. Every high-value URL that changes must map to a single, relevant destination. Avoid redirect chains, avoid “catch-all” redirects to the home page, and avoid soft 404 outcomes where the new page doesn’t match the intent of the old one.
The most reliable approach is to build a redirect matrix early. Start from the current crawl and classify URLs into groups: keep as-is, change with redirect, consolidate, retire with redirect to nearest equivalent, and intentionally remove (rare, and still typically redirected). Then, validate the new routing rules against that matrix.
If your redesign involves internationalization, subdomains, or path-based locales, redirect planning must include language and region logic. Similarly, if you’re migrating to a composable setup with multiple front-ends (marketing site, help center, documentation, portal), your redirects must be coordinated across applications. This is where many “successful” launches quietly fail: the core site redirects correctly, but secondary properties or legacy subfolders are forgotten, leaking authority.
Phase 4: Re-Architect Information Architecture Around Search Intent
A redesign is your best chance to improve topical authority - if you redesign your information architecture based on intent rather than internal org charts. In 2025, Google’s systems increasingly reward clarity: pages that satisfy specific intents with strong semantics, logical internal linking, and content that demonstrates expertise.
Start with your top organic landing pages and queries. Identify what each page is meant to rank for, whether it matches the query intent, and whether it should remain a standalone page or be consolidated into a stronger hub. Then design navigation and internal linking so that important pages are reachable within a few clicks and are contextually reinforced by related content.
This is also where enterprise CMS capabilities matter. Hybrid and headless architectures can be excellent for structured content and reuse, but they can also encourage content fragmentation if teams create dozens of thin pages from modular blocks. Your IA should be deliberate: fewer, stronger pages often outperform many weak ones - especially when you support them with internal links, schema, and supporting content clusters.
Phase 5: Make the CMS “SEO-Ready” by Design
SEO success in 2025 is as much about editorial systems as it is about code. Your CMS should make it easy to publish high-quality, technically compliant content without requiring developers for every change.
At a minimum, an SEO-ready content model should provide control over titles, meta descriptions, canonical tags, structured headings, and indexability settings at the page level. It should handle image alt text and media metadata as first-class fields, not afterthoughts. It should generate clean URLs consistently and prevent accidental duplication due to inconsistent routing.
If you’re using personalization or experimentation, establish rules so search engines see stable versions of pages. Personalization should not create crawlable variants, parameterized URLs, or inconsistent canonicalization. A DXP can deliver powerful experience optimization, but without guardrails, it can also create index noise that dilutes relevance.
Platforms like Kentico, WordPress, and Optimizely can all support strong SEO outcomes, but the difference is almost always implementation: content modeling, template discipline, and governance determine whether the platform becomes an SEO accelerator or a source of technical debt.
Phase 6: Performance, Core Web Vitals, and Modern Rendering Validation
Performance isn’t optional. Core Web Vitals influence user behavior and can affect organic outcomes through engagement and crawl efficiency. During a redesign, teams often add heavier design systems, more third-party scripts, and larger media - all of which can degrade performance unless actively managed.
Treat performance like a release requirement. Define budgets for LCP, INP, and CLS, and measure them on representative templates. If you’re deploying a headless or JavaScript-heavy front end, validate server-side rendering, hydration behavior, and how bots receive content. You want search engines to receive complete, indexable HTML without relying on fragile client-side execution. Rendering issues are one of the most common causes of “the content is live, but it’s not ranking” after modern rebuilds.
Also, verify accessibility as part of SEO quality. Semantic structure, proper headings, link clarity, and image descriptions improve usability - and correlate with clearer machine interpretation.
Phase 7: Analytics, Search Console, and Post-Launch Monitoring
A redesign without measurement is a gamble. Ensure analytics and tag management are implemented consistently across templates and environments, and confirm that conversion tracking survives the rebuild. In 2025, measurement often spans multiple systems (web analytics, CDPs, experimentation platforms), so QA needs to validate not just pageviews but the events that matter to the business.
Before launch, confirm Search Console and sitemap strategy for the new site. Immediately after launch, monitor index coverage, crawl errors, redirect integrity, and server response stability. The first weeks are about rapid detection: catching unexpected noindex tags, blocked resources, broken canonicals, redirect gaps, and accidental duplication before they calcify into long-term ranking loss.
Expect volatility. Even a perfect migration can cause short-term shifts as search engines reprocess signals. Your job is to reduce volatility and recover quickly by ensuring the new site is technically clean, semantically stronger, and easier to crawl than the old one.
Phase 8: Use AI to Improve Editorial Scale Without Sacrificing Quality
AI is now part of modern content operations, but it should be applied with discipline. The best use cases during a redesign are workflow acceleration and consistency: assisting with metadata drafts, generating structured outlines for new pages, summarizing legacy content for consolidation planning, and flagging thin or duplicative pages at scale.
What AI should not do is publish unreviewed, generic content. In a redesign context, low-quality AI output can amplify duplication and dilute topical authority. Strong teams treat AI as a co-pilot: useful for speed, dangerous without editorial standards, governance, and human expertise.
Conclusion: Redesign SEO Is a Program, Not a Checklist
A successful redesign in 2025 is built on clarity: clear baselines, clear redirect mapping, clear information architecture aligned to intent, clear CMS governance, and clear technical standards for performance and crawlability. When those foundations are in place, redesigns don’t just preserve rankings - they create a platform for growth, enabling better content operations, faster iteration, and more consistent multi-channel experience delivery.
If you approach your redesign as an SEO migration program - supported by modern CMS practices, composable architecture planning, and disciplined measurement - you’ll protect existing equity and build a stronger digital experience that can evolve for years without repeated re-platforming pain.
Moonstone Interactive helps organizations plan and execute website redesigns and CMS migrations that protect organic visibility while improving performance, governance, and long-term scalability. If you’re preparing a redesign or re-platform, we can help you reduce risk and build an SEO-ready foundation. Contact Moonstone today for a free consultation!